Select: Design - Brackets - Bracket distance from systemic barline = 0 Select: Design - Brackets - Bracket end Design = none Select: Instruments of the same Kind within a bracketed group - Brace Select: Instruments of the same Kind within a bracketed group - Use secondary Brackets Going to Engraving Options, selecting Brackets and Braces and then Starting a new project, loading the same voice twice from the Singers group (I chose Soprano)ĭouble clicking on the names and changing them to Piano (T) and Piano (B) If you’re after articulations on one staff and not on the other this approach should work as what you have are two instances of the same instrument that are independent from each other. That gives you the flexibility of having what you want on either staff. You’re not splitting staffs, you’re joining two different ones to give the appearance of a grand staff. Could you give me a step-by-step guide, please?
#CAN I CHANGE PAN IN PIANOTEQ 6? HOW TO#
The only problem is, I don’t know how to split staffs. If everything else had been as poor as the harpsichord, I wouldn’t have kept it on my PC even if it was free.
#CAN I CHANGE PAN IN PIANOTEQ 6? SOFTWARE#
(That makes sense to me, first because it makes NP notation-program-independent, and second because reverse engineering expression maps etc would be too easy for competitors to do!)įull disclosure - I have tried the NP harpsichord, and IMO it is by far the worst thing I’ve tried so far in the software - which might explain why I haven’t rushed to try the piano as well.
![can i change pan in pianoteq 6? can i change pan in pianoteq 6?](https://www.modartt.com/images/manual/pianoteq7/filtering_md.jpg)
In fact the user guide says (correctly in my experience so far) that it works better with most of Dorico’s “humanized playback” options turned off.įor example if you play something simple like a major scale of equal length notes with no articulations etc marked in the Dorico score, the way NP plays it depends on the tempo (and possibly on the dynamics as well), in the same way that a human player would choose tempo-dependent bowing or tonging techniques, maybe different fingerings, etc.įWIW there seems to be only one NP expression map for ALL instruments, so much of the “musical intelligence” must be embedded in the program code, not in the MIDI input. That’s why it sounds so much better than other playback libraries with “no user tweaking required”. I haven’t tried NP for piano yet, but for orchestral instrument playback it is MUCH “smarter” than just using the literal MIDI data created by Dorico. I’m not a NP user, but would it even have any use for an expression map for a piano? Certainly this is something that could be rendered correctly off the note lengths and velocities alone?